Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Persecuting California Judges for being Trustworthy, Loyal, Helpful, Friendly, Courteous, Kind, Obedient, Cheerful....

...Thrify, Brave, Clean and Reverent.

And so it begins.

Edmund Burke once said, "All it takes for evil to triumph, is for good men to do nothing." The majority of us sit in our comfortable homes, worried that being outspoken in our beliefs and valiant in the cause of liberty and freedom will "hurt someone's feelings," so we say little and do even less.

TODAY, you need to engage in righteousness. TODAY you need to strike a blow against evil. TODAY, right now, your voice needs to bray against the darkness, and against those who would defeat people of valor.

TODAY, April 15th,  is the last day (and I just found out about it 10 minutes ago) to add your comments in OPPOSITION to Judicial Persecution. If this ordinance passes, ALL JUDGES in the State of California, will be REQUIRED to cease any membership in the Boy Scouts of America or resign their position as judges.

WHAT'S NEXT? HOW FAR WILL YOU ALLOW STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO DICTATE YOUR PRIVATE LIFE?

It's ironic that the very homosexual activists which claim they want government out of their lives, are demanding that government be inserted in your judges'.

The regulation proposed is a change in the California Code of Judicial Ethics. The change would subject a judicial officer to disciplinary action for affiliating with the Boy Scouts of America.

The proposal, endorsed by California's Supreme Court Chief Justice Tanil Cantil-Sakauye, (nothing like REAL bigotry to claim bigotry falsely), is officially described here:  http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/SP14-02.pdf. It is known obliquely as simply "SP14-02"

To register your opinion on SP14-02, please use the comment form here:
 http://www.courts.ca.gov/invitation-comment-form.htm?proposal=SP14-02&deadline=April%2015,%202014

THE DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS IS TODAY! SPREAD THE WORD !

The following are some points you may wish to note:

A. Many judicial officers serve as BSA leaders--especially among Latter-day Saints and other religious groups, who accept this role as a matter of religious duty. By their BSA leadership, men and women alike, provide excellent role models for young men and women.

B. There is no evidence that any judicial officer who belongs to BSA has exhibited bias from the bench on the basis of sexual orientation.

C. Prohibiting membership in the BSA does violence to the ideal of viewpoint diversity among bench officers. Many such officers have deep and reasonable convictions concerning the morality of homosexual conduct. But these same officers retain an equally profound commitment to equal justice for all, regardless of individual sexual orientation. To suggest these judicial officers cannot act impartially is intolerant and narrow-minded.

Kathryn's personal note: I would go further. It's not just intolerant and narrow-minded. It is EVIL.

Strike a blow against evil RIGHT NOW. Click on the hyperlink, register a comment in opposition, and SPREAD THE WORD RIGHT NOW. The mainstream media has been SILENT.

Thank you.


No comments:

Post a Comment